Brown University Ranking (Consistently Worst in Ivy Leagues)
Brown University has the distinct misfortune of consistently receiving the worst ranking among Ivy League schools in the highly regarded US News and World Reports rankings that are released annually. In the Best Colleges 2010 edition Brown came in at the number sixteen overall spot in terms of the most highly privileged category of National Universities Rankings. For the 2010 rankings Brown finished one spot behind fellow Ivy League school Cornell University. Unfortunately for the good folks at Brown being associated with such a prestigious group as the Ivy League means accepting the reality that when competitiveness in an objective ranking system with such highly regarded institutions at least one member will have to come in last place.
Being a top twenty American university (and in this particular instance a top sixteen university) is certainly no small feat. In fact, the case can easily be made that all of the top tier schools are outstanding institutions of higher education that provide generous resources for the bright students on the planet. Parents all over the world would love to be able to give their children the opportunity to attend the top universities in America.
Brown University, located in Providence Rhode Island, has a storied history that dates back to pre-Revolutionary War days in a time before the United States of America even exhausted. Founded in 1764 by Baptist, Brown University has been both a proud member of the Colonial Colleges (recognizing the nine oldest North American institutions of higher learning) and the Ivy League which is formally adopted the Ivy title only as recently as 1954 to distinguish the athletic conference in which eight academically focused members compete.
The eight schools that make up the Ivy League along with their 2010 US News and World Report rankings are:
- Harvard University (tied for number 1: 2010 US News and World Report rank)
- Princeton University (tied for number 1: 2010 US News and World Report rank)
- Yale University (number 3: 2010 US News and World Report rank)
- University of Pennsylvania (number 4: 2010 US News and World Report rank)
- Columbia University (number 8: 2010 US News and World Report rank)
- Dartmouth College (number 11: 2010 US News and World Report rank),
- Cornell University (number 15: 2010 US News and World Report rank), and finally
- Brown University (number 16: 2010 US News and World Report rank).
As evident by the co-number one spots (this year Harvard and Princeton) there are ties in the rankings. Also of note is the fact that clearly the Ivy League schools do not simply make up the entire list from positions one through eight. Sprinkled through the top sixteen spots are well-respected non-Ivy League schools like:
- Stanford (number 4: 2010 US News and World Report rank),
- Duke (number 10: 2010 US News and World Report rank)
- Washington University in St. Louis Louis (number 12: 2010 US News and World Report rank), and
- Johns Hopkins University (number 14: 2010 US News and World Report rank) among others.
Over the past ten years the US News and World Report rankings for Brown University have fluctuated while remaining in the teens during the last decade. Although Brown holds a ranking enviable by the vast majority of schools the position in the back of the Ivy League pack has led to some schools (like Brown) questioning the importance and validity of the rankings.
In terms of addressing the concern as to the importance of these national rankings the only assertion that can be stated with absolute certainty is that no one knows exactly how big of a role these rankings play in terms of influencing which schools top students choose to attend. In an ideal world all students would have unlimited resources and the ability to become intimately familiar with the curriculum and environment of every college before making informed decisions about which settings best suit their personalities and meet their needs. The reality is that this utopia simply will never exist and for most prospective freshmen the closest they will get to understand what programs are available is through what they learn in publications like the annual US News and World Reports rankings. While schools that are less than satisfied with their current rankings are more than happy to argue that the rankings are irrelevant the truth of the matter that these schools are at best in denial about the influence these rankings have on highly competitive teens that have been raised in an environment that instills a mentality of constantly chasing for the highest grades and best test scores.
Regardless of how parents, students, or admissions offices feel about ranking colleges there are two points that are clearly indisputable:
(1) the debate over the ability of these rankings to accurately measure subject issues will continue for quite some time and
(2) these rankings are here to stay.